ETF share-class comparison

IWDD vs SWDA

Compare exact share classes, listing currencies and quoted costs. Country tax treatment is outside this product comparison.

Research country (tax not calculated): Spain

Product facts and cost arithmetic only. Spain is the declared research context, not a claim of Spanish tax coverage. No investor-tax or fund-withholding outcome is calculated.

Verified product facts

These facts identify the exact share classes. The issuer reference pages do not date each static field; the verification date records our check, not a historical effective date.

Verified product facts
FieldIWDDSWDA
Exact share-class nameiShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist)iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
ISINIE000OHHIBC6IE00B4L5Y983
BenchmarkMSCI World Index (Net)MSCI World Index (Net)
DomicileIrelandIreland
Fund base currencyUSDUSD
ReplicationPhysical, optimisedPhysical, optimised
Selected listings

IWDD · London Stock Exchange · GBP

IWDD · Euronext Amsterdam · USD

SWDA · London Stock Exchange · GBP

EUNL · Deutsche Börse Xetra · EUR

IWDA · Euronext Amsterdam · EUR

Published ongoing charge0.20% TER

Cost source date: 2026-09-05

0.20% TER

Cost source date: 2026-09-05

Issuer sourceExact issuer share-class page

Verified: 2026-09-05

Exact issuer share-class page

Verified: 2026-09-05

A listing currency is the currency of the exchange trade. It does not establish currency hedging or the currencies of the underlying businesses. No investor currency or exchange rate is assumed here.

OCF and TER are the issuer’s reported cost measures, shown under their original labels. They exclude some costs and are not a quote for your broker. Spreads, dealing/FX charges, liquidity, fund-level withholding and investor tax remain outside this comparison.

issuer-facts-2026-09-05-1

What changes between these choices

IWDD and SWDA both track MSCI World Index (Net), a developed-market index. Both use optimised physical portfolios and quote 0.20% TER. IWDD distributes quarterly; SWDA accumulates. IWDD has GBP London and USD Amsterdam listings, so a ticker alone does not identify the dealing currency.

Holding both versions does not add a second benchmark exposure. Cash distributions, reinvestment timing and account treatment matter; counting two tickers is not a measure of diversification.

A cost-only illustration

Fictional €10,000 starting balance, zero gross return, no contributions or withdrawals, the quoted annual charge held constant for 20 years. This isolates the charge; it does not forecast either fund’s return.

IWDD
First-year charge at a constant balance: 20.00 EUR
Balance after 20 years: 9,607.51 EUR
Difference from no charges: 392.49 EUR
SWDA
First-year charge at a constant balance: 20.00 EUR
Balance after 20 years: 9,607.51 EUR
Difference from no charges: 392.49 EUR

Method: first year = 10,000 × charge; final balance = 10,000 × (1 − charge)^20. No tax, spreads, trading fees or FX conversion. Equal quoted charges give equal results in this restricted illustration.

IWDD vs SWDA

Distributing

IWDD

Pays reported dividends to the fund holder.

Issuer source

Accumulating

SWDA

Reinvests income inside the fund.

Issuer source

What this page compares

Distribution policy
Cash distribution versus reinvestment
Tax context
Country context is shown for research, not a tax calculation
Declared inputs
Ticker pair, country, and issuer sources
Check these ETFs inside my actual portfolio Sample report and calculation assumptions

This page presents product facts and arithmetic inputs. It does not make a personal recommendation.

Issuer links are provided for product details and share-class confirmation.