ETF share-class comparison

IUSA vs CSPX

Compare exact share classes, listing currencies and quoted costs. Country tax treatment is outside this product comparison.

Research country (tax not calculated): Spain

Product facts and cost arithmetic only. Spain is the declared research context, not a claim of Spanish tax coverage. No investor-tax or fund-withholding outcome is calculated.

Verified product facts

These facts identify the exact share classes. The issuer reference pages do not date each static field; the verification date records our check, not a historical effective date.

Verified product facts
FieldIUSACSPX
Exact share-class nameiShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Dist)iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
ISINIE0031442068IE00B5BMR087
BenchmarkS&P 500 IndexS&P 500 Index
DomicileIrelandIreland
Fund base currencyUSDUSD
ReplicationPhysicalPhysical
Selected listings

IUSA · London Stock Exchange · GBP

IUSA · Deutsche Börse Xetra · EUR

IDUS · London Stock Exchange · USD

CSPX · London Stock Exchange · USD

SXR8 · Deutsche Börse Xetra · EUR

CSP1 · London Stock Exchange · GBP

Published ongoing charge0.07% TER

Cost source date: 2026-09-05

0.07% TER

Cost source date: 2026-09-05

Issuer sourceExact issuer share-class page

Verified: 2026-09-05

Exact issuer share-class page

Verified: 2026-09-05

A listing currency is the currency of the exchange trade. It does not establish currency hedging or the currencies of the underlying businesses. No investor currency or exchange rate is assumed here.

OCF and TER are the issuer’s reported cost measures, shown under their original labels. They exclude some costs and are not a quote for your broker. Spreads, dealing/FX charges, liquidity, fund-level withholding and investor tax remain outside this comparison.

issuer-facts-2026-09-05-1

What changes between these choices

IUSA and CSPX both track S&P 500 and quote 0.07% TER. They are issued by different iShares legal companies (iShares plc and iShares VII plc). London IUSA trades in GBP while CSPX trades in USD; the GBP accumulating listing is CSP1.

Holding both versions does not add a second benchmark exposure. Cash distributions, reinvestment timing and account treatment matter; counting two tickers is not a measure of diversification.

A cost-only illustration

Fictional €10,000 starting balance, zero gross return, no contributions or withdrawals, the quoted annual charge held constant for 20 years. This isolates the charge; it does not forecast either fund’s return.

IUSA
First-year charge at a constant balance: 7.00 EUR
Balance after 20 years: 9,860.93 EUR
Difference from no charges: 139.07 EUR
CSPX
First-year charge at a constant balance: 7.00 EUR
Balance after 20 years: 9,860.93 EUR
Difference from no charges: 139.07 EUR

Method: first year = 10,000 × charge; final balance = 10,000 × (1 − charge)^20. No tax, spreads, trading fees or FX conversion. Equal quoted charges give equal results in this restricted illustration.

IUSA vs CSPX

Distributing

IUSA

Pays reported dividends to the fund holder.

Issuer source

Accumulating

CSPX

Reinvests income inside the fund.

Issuer source

What this page compares

Distribution policy
Cash distribution versus reinvestment
Tax context
Country context is shown for research, not a tax calculation
Declared inputs
Ticker pair, country, and issuer sources
Check these ETFs inside my actual portfolio Sample report and calculation assumptions

This page presents product facts and arithmetic inputs. It does not make a personal recommendation.

Issuer links are provided for product details and share-class confirmation.